17 Comments »

I will do my part. I’ve linked this blog and your forum from my own site.

Thank you for your efforts.

It is my opinion that in order to defeat Islaam the nature of the Qur’an, Hadeeth, Sunna, and Sha’ria must be made known to Modernity.

I am tired of hearing “Radical Islaam”, as though there were a “Moderate Islaam”. The Qur’an is written in order to gaurantee immoderation. There is no avenue that Muslims can take to moderate their religion. Islaam, by it’s very nature, is immoderate.

Read Muslim liturgy, and pass the word out Sura and verse.

This is a great idea! I was in the military for 18 years and I was very proud of the small part I and my fellow Airmen played in ending the iron fist that controlled the Soviet Union. 1989 was a year I will never forget as I watched as the people destroying the Berlin Wall by hand.

This Islamofacism is even worse than a Communist. These Islamofacists will send a child strapped with dynamite into a crowded resturant to kill “infidels”, and be proud of it! At least the Communists’ were brave enough to face the enemy themselves.

Our responsiblity is not to try to understand Islamofacism, our only responsibility is to destroy it before it destroys us. We stop to analize to many things today and we need to take action.

The first thing we can do for our country is stop sending our dollars to Islamofacist countries in the middle east, including Saudi Arabia. If this means drilling for our own oil in ANWAR, off the coast of Florida, and the off the coast of California, then lets get at it. THIS IS A WAR DAMN IT!!!!

Enviormentalism is important, and what we do today may affect us in fifty or a hundred years from now. But what they do tomorrow may affect us even worse the day after tomorrow.

Destroying their economy is more important at this point and time, and if we stop buying their oil right now, we will do more damage than we have by removing Saddam. And that goes for Venezula too.

We work to establish and preserve basic human rights through representative democracy.

But hey, direct democracy is okay too, istn’ it?

I am so very grateful to have been born into a country where the representative democratic process of our republic has served so well. I am keenly aware none of this could have been possible had the citizens of the early fledgling independent states not sought to extend to all states the same peace they sought. Guided by the simple premise, treat your neighbor as you would like to be treated, our country was born and destined to extend basic human rights even had a monarchy been established.

The history of pre-WWII Europe taught us democracy alone was not the answer to peace. Had democracy alone been the answer to peaceful co-existence within and between nations, we would not have the histories of tens of millions that died as a result of wars brought about by Mussolini and Hitler, both of whom gained their assent to power by way of democracies within Italy and Germany.

Unlike a democratic form of government that can be imposed on a people, the desire to extend peace in equal measure among a people cannot be imposed, but must be born of the people themselves. Seek the higher ground whatever form of government a country chooses to be governed by.

Good beginning! It’s time to raise all the free to fight with the green fever virus. We must also create our symbols to recognize our friends and to fear the enemies:
Number - 910 (is this bound with 9/11 or anything else?)
Colors - Gold, Blue, Purple, Red, and the color of human body (which the enemies want to hide)
Symbols - The Woman in Gold Dress, with Stars above her Head, and with Moon below her Feet (from Bible)
Flag - Should contain the Heart, the Sun and the Sky (Love + Light + Peace = Freedom). All THEY make is Hate + Darkness + War = is**m.
Anthem - Yet to create.

What we MUST remember first:

The fifth column. Some blame Left for all, some blame liberalism, marxism, post-modernism, feminism etc. This is not appropriate tactics. The key word of what we must fight first in our minds is RELATIVISM and SEGREGATION. This includes: racism and nazism - without doubts, communism - this card had played, and what is most inacceptable is MULTICULTURALISM. Why?

So called MULTICULTURALISM DENIES HUMANITY IN HUMANS. It says a human being is the hostage of his/her “culture” first. But any limiting of our (Western) values to us leads to racism, to segregation and to lose. This was Hitler’s tactics, and this is islamic apologets’ tactics. But the isolation is not only inacceptable for its immorality and hypocrisy, it is impossible. THE WORLD IS TOO SMALL FOR TWO CIVILIZATIONS. ONLY ONE WILL WIN, AND IT MUST BE OURS.

What are the enemy plans (if we behave like sheep):
- Infiltrating groups into our societies which refuse to integrate, have their own para-authorities (currently)
- Legalizing these groups by declaring them “out of law” (and under the sharia) - this leads directly to Middle Ages (they are trying to do this regularly)
- Limiting ANYONE’s freedoms inside OUR countries “in order to keep peace” or under any other sheep clothings (like they did in Denmark (cartoons) and Germany (Idomeneo))
- Buying mass media to lull civilians by propaganda (what is going on in USA, Europe and worldwide)
- Setting up “authonomy” (i.e. SEPARATISM) of territories where the INFILTRATED ALIENS live (what they demand in France, and what eventually leads to Kosovo-like tragedies)
- Raising militias to terrorize the good citizens and force them to give (partly) power to TERRORISTS (what happened in Lebanon)
- Capturing the full power and throwing down the legal government (Afghanistan under Taliban, Iran in 1979)
- Doing this WORLDWIDE.

THIS CANNOT BE ACCEPTED BY ANYONE WHO CALL H**SELF HUMAN.

DEFENDING STRATEGY:

- Prevent the alien infiltrated groups from coming; weaken and destroy the existing ones. Close down their mosques. It is a good idea to demolish one wahhabit-founded mosque (actually all built after 2000) for any single terrorist act. Of course, at night, we don’t want to kill even zombies - we are DESTROYING THE “CULTURE” OF HATE, DEATH AND WAR.

- Paying people’s attention to make any para-legislation or para-sovereignty system ILLEGAL AND IMPOSSIBLE. ONE STATE, ONE LAW!

- Protecting freedom of speech, explaining people why it is impossible to have freedom even to hate and to blasphemy - because otherwise the love and the faith are enforced and become fake love and fake faith, as today in islamic zones.

- Distributing a very good habit to disallow any monopolized mass media channels from zombying you, and always to get information from multiple sources - even from enemies, to map one to another and to filter the grain of truth. The enemy’s direct propaganda’s stupidity must be revealed and laughed at.

- Not a square inch of land to give up! The idea of any authonomy inside a country or a city must be considered as betraying the nation and inacceptable under any conditions.

- In the difficult areas (and not only), creating groups of self-defence forces (SDF), to be able to organize mass protests in case of enemy war actions, like Russians did in Kondopoga after Chechen gangsters killed two people “because they were angry”. The SDF then burned out a Chechen-owned restaurant and kicked all of chechens out of their town. (When it came to protests, the 30000-people town had gathered 2000 to the meeting.)

- Spreading counter-propaganda against any enemy representative trying to get power - no circus with Quran in Congress should be allowed!

- Uniting with allies from around the world who fight against islamofascists.

ATTACKING STRATEGY:

We should not only to defend the West. We must MAKE THE WORLD BECAME THE GLOBAL WEST, OR THE WEST WILL DISAPPEAR. That’s it. No negotiations. No hudnas. The war to the victory!

- Infiltrate ENEMY zones. Set up cells of resistanse in Iran, Iraq, Saudi-occupied future Republic of Arabia, Pakistan. Prepare for breaking relations with these countries when it comes to war - no presidents or Popes standing on their knees in the temple of Satan anymore!
- Work with victims of enemies. Know enemy’s weaknesses and use them in any way that helps FREE WORLD.
- Make them angry, it really weakens them, not us, and wakes those who are doubting and can break out with islam after seeing it unveiled. Spread cartoons, pork, dogs, swine blood, piglet toys, condoms. Enemy does not care that it is or its values are “unhuman”. They are like beasts, they respect only power and threat. So SHAME ON MOHAMMAD, ALLAH IS WEAK, WE KNOW THAT ALLAH’s 100th NAME IS SHAITAN.
- Support missionaries of anything but islam (and things like nazism, satanism or racism) who work with green-fevered. There is one God. Atheism is also important to make the faith true - as expression of human goodwill among the alternatives, not any kind of enforcement (as in islam).
- Work with OUR potential renegates (women going to marry those unhumans - give them a book of Carmen Bin Laden) and with enemy’s potential apostates (anyone considered “moderate” and not supporting islamofascist actions), tell them the main difference between the Cross and the crescent, and tell them why not all religions or “cultures” are equal, why the faith must be free.
- After setting up SDF groups and letting them grow, encourage them for actions of bloodless resistance: putting stickers “ALLAH IS WEAK”, 910, cartoons, freedom fighter site addresses, writing graffiti (and destroying enemies’ ones), mild hooligan actions as unveiling the sack-wearing women zombies, up to desecrating and demolishing enemy mosques (any built in last 10-100 years).
- Mirror the enemy’s plans in its “own” coutries, up to infesting their governments and armies. Some of us must play islamic neophites, including saying shihada and other “true islamist” actions - like in good old spy stories. This is not apostacy - this is war for Life, Love and God. Sure, such agents must be prepared well, we must found a network of schools or camps to train such volunteers, make them psychologically stable enough to hold under islamofascist pressure, and make them play “serious” muslims who know quran as his fingers. The islamist openness for anyone who desire to be muslim SHOULD BE USED AGAINST THEM!
- The war will continue until all islamofascist regimes fall, including present countries and possible future enclaves anywhere on Earth (and not only), until islamofascism is recognized as the anti-human ideology and banned worldwide by the structure which will replace UAN (United Arab Nations, trojanized by arab oil dictators).

ISLAM IS WEAK. ISLAMOFASCISTS ARE BEASTS. THE BEAST MUST DIE.

Count me in!! 100+%

There is an old baseball story of how the championship game-winning home run hitter was called out at home plate in the bottom of the ninth with two out. When they got the enraged home crowd quieted, the announcer said: “The runner was called out because … he … didn’t … touch … first … base!”

In fighting islamofascism, we first must touch first base. If we do not defeat the fifth column in our midst, all else will fail. That fifth column is the culturally illiterate, intellectually dishonest, professionally corrupt, America-hating news media. We must boycott and bankrupt them.

Few Americans know that a newspaper’s life blood is advertising revenues, and advertising rates are based on home-delivered subscriptions, not street sales. If we cancel our subscription and buy the rag off the newsstand, the paper is forced to cut its ad rates and lose vitally needed revenues in times of escalating production costs. But that is not enough. We must call the profit-oriented publisher–never the uncaring editor–and tell him that we have cancelled because we are sick and tired of being lied to by his paper. Then we must persuade five others from among family and friends who think as we do to do the very same thing. Cancel, and get five others to cancel.

Busting the terrorist-loving networks is even simpler. Bar their news programs forever from our living rooms, and watch Fox News and Jim Lehrer. And convince five others to do the same thing and to persuade five others to do the same.

Is this not a lot of trouble? Well, are we not at war?

Marco Gilliam

The primary motivation for this group is its loathing for Islam, and its spread thereof and its threats especially against western interest; variously, culture, rights and values, democracy, and so on. Clearly, If there was no 911 there would be no 910. Be that as it may be, its reason for existence then is founded on a single key and defensive position. Beyond that Baron Bodissey then pads up the group’s raison d’etre with the so-called statement of principles, which reads fine. Examine them closely.

Let’s begin with the opening lines (to which they are paraphrased):

(1) The 910 Group … work(s) actively for liberty throughout the world.

Substitute 910 Group with Ummah, it then gets: The “911 Ummah works actively for Sharia divine rights throughout the world…”

(2)… liberty must be founded upon the rights of all individuals.

Substitute “liberty” with freedom and so on, then “… freedom must be founded upon the liberty of all individuals free from state oppression…”

(3) We work to establish and preserve basic human rights through representative democracy.

Substitute “human” with “culture” and “representative democray with “electoral democracy”, you then get: “We work to establish and preserve basic cultural rights through electoral democracy.”

This list can go on and on, but three is enough. It is not semantics that the above parallel viewpoints were presented because the statement of principles reads in tone and its totality of fact much like, (1) a jihadist tract, or (2) an anarchist-Marxist polemic, or (3) a multiculturalist credo. Yet, the 910 group would be against all three.

Naturally, if one doesn’t subscribe to the statement of principles, then one is free not to become a group member (in case Baron missed it, leftists love such organisations because they offer means of control). Yet, dissuading membership is not a purpose in the statement of principles. On the contrary, its purpose is not solely to anchor a set of positions, but it is also to draw adherents to the same cause. And what is the cause, the true and fundamental cause? Answer is given: “We seek to reverse radical islam’s intention to wage global jihad…”

Here then is the problem when you attach the purposes of conflict to, say, values and politics. The problem starts with the questioning, just questions, not the answers because the answers are self-evident:

(a) How does the statement of principles defend the liberty of the Muslim and his liberty and rights to live and preach his religion, which is Islam?

(b) How does the statement of principles defend the human rights of the Muslim, as a Muslim, and his liberty to live in accordance with his religion and the dictates of its rules?

(c) If the statement of principles propagate religion and of the right of association as “universal”, will it then deny the universality and the right of ummah as a legitimate association?

(d) If the statement of principles seeks to “establish” representative democracy, will it deny the human and democratic right of 51 percent of the population of London or Aarhus, and who are Muslims, to the “universal” value of its religion by the establishment of Sharia law in their lives?

Again, the questioning can go on and on, but enough. You see, the statement of principles is full of holes. Worse, the principles contain in essence a kind of dogma that parallels the multiculturalist, liberalist and leftist creeds all in one go. At the times when it stops preaching and propagating a political agenda (liberty, democracy and so on), it is preaching precisely the kind of values multiculturalist hold dearly. This is also to say, the statement is full of contradictions.

The surprise then to a reader, who let’s say supports the cause to stop Islamification, is to find, in the statement of principles, the 910 Group in bed with western apologists for Islamification. But, yet, one suspects that is not the intent. Rather the statement is a reflection of a scheme poorly and badly thought through. That is, it stands on sandy soil; its philosophical scaffolding looks ready to collapse; its blogging members just toying around; hence, hardly to be taken seriously.

All that is even the greater surprise because the Fjordman files and some of the comments (say, by David S, much as he despised for his views) actually contain the core ingredients for the principles. Yet the statement goes against them, or don’t the members know?

It seems your group is a congregation of fascists.
What the hell you are talking about Arab fascism?
Is somebody driving your agenda ? Do you believe Bush and Teocon push to a global anti terrorist war?
Try and read more and different books!

The goals of the 910 Group seem similar to those of my proposed Order of Charles Martel (OCM):

* The OCM respects as equals all religions (and non-religious creeds) whose foundations rest in respect for the natural human rights of all people.

* While the OCM denounces racism–specifically the position that one person might be better than another because of his or her genetic origin–it states unapologetically that not all the world’s cultures are equal. Islamofascist cultures that degrade women, engage in religious oppression, condone slavery, and promote barbaric violence are not equal to Euro-American cultures that respect and uphold the natural rights of all human beings. The OCM defines objectively as Good any system or culture that upholds and preserves the natural human rights of all people and condemns as Evil any system or culture that attacks those rights. It is the avowed mission of the Order to defend Civilization from the evil of Islamofascism, aka militant “Islam,” through all appropriate legal and public relations methods.

P.S. I’ve seen Fjordman’s material and I have quoted it frequently. Needless to say, “Gates of Vienna” also got my attention; I was there in ‘83!

[…] On May 3rd, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007 (H.R. 1592) has passed the House and brings us closer to the criminalization of speech. See the WorldNetDaily article for background: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55254Hat tip to the 910 Group. Here’s their quick-look assessment. . […]

[…] Who or what is the Vigilant Freedom/910 Group you ask? The 910 Vision is for Liberty to Prevail Worldwide […]

“…we repudiate all motives sourced from hate, revenge, or intolerance.”

I think rejecting the ‘revenge’ part is a stumbling block to understanding what it takes to fight an enemy. The only reason I am here is hatred and intolerance of what is threatening our nation. The tolerant are tricked into acceptence. Tolerance does not generate assimilation nor does it inspire one to your cultural values.

Those that understand and love what we have do not need tolerance, they need support and encouragement.

Not hating something does not inspire sacrifice to rid it. Revenge is what comes after the battle is won and usually initiated by those that did the actual suffering of horrors at the hands of the enemy.

I think a few terrorists bombs killing and horribly maimimg my innocent loved ones would inspire me to join a revenge campaign. The goal of a hate driven vengeful army is the same as a pc tolerant army. Victory! Yea, good luck pc army.
Your tactics are an inspiration to, uh, … the enemy?

[…] More about the Vigilant Freedom/910 Group… […]

I’m in.

The “Statement of Principles” is a well-written, fair, and noble goal. I’ll do my part to help.

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website